Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mai Hontama vs Gail Brodsky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hontama vs Brodsky analysis and find out who is favored!
Mai Hontama vs Gail Brodsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hontama 1 - 0 Brodsky
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hontama has won 44.29% of points on their second serve, while Brodsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hontama, in recent form, has won 59.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brodsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.41% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hontama has saved 52.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brodsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hontama has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 44/ 32), with Brodsky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hontama has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 191/ 113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6). Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Hontama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 15), where as Brodsky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hontama winning 1 times and Brodsky being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hontama winning 2 and Brodsky winning 0. The last match between Hontama and Brodsky was at the W60 Honolulu, 09-07-2019, First, Hard with Mai Hontama getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hontama and Brodsky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hontama winning 0 times and Brodsky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hontama winning 0, and Brodsky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hontama has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.97 while Brodsky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hontama has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brodsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hontama has converted 49.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brodsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
109
Rank
108
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
182
High
33
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
61% (254-160)
Career Total W/L
57% (146-110)
53% (19-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$435,667
Career Prize Money
$33,595
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mai Hontama vs Gail Brodsky For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hontama VS Brodsky
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mai Hontama | Gail Brodsky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (36/53) | 49% (27/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (21/36) | 44% (12/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (8/17) | 32% (9/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (34/55) | 45% (24/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Mai Hontama
Player
Gail Brodsky
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mai Hontama | Gail Brodsky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (19/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (43/41) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (394/381) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (16/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:27 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 189.36 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1845/2607) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (1059/1845) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (338/762) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (169/342) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1213/2545) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (19/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Mai Hontama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amarni Banks
Player
Mai Hontama
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
7 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Cristina Dinu
Player
Mai Hontama
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
52%
(
11 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
19
Total Points Won
28
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Carol Zhao
76%
(
93 of
122)
1st Serve %
71%
(
102 of
143)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
19
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
60 of
102)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
9 of
41)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
61 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
74 of
143)
135
Total Points Won
130
|
7-5 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Mai Hontama
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Amandine Hesse
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Mai Hontama
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Radka Zelnickova
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Mai Hontama
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gail Brodsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Gail Brodsky
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
37%
(
16 of
43)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Gail Brodsky
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Gail Brodsky
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Abbie Myers
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Gail Brodsky
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Gail Brodsky
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Haley Giavara
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Gail Brodsky
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hontama Vs Brodsky Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hontama are available here and Brodsky photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
